Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. LG G7 Fit is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a screen that's just as good as LG G7 Fit's display, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. Motorola Droid Turbo has a little faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Droid Turbo takes clearer photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments and a much better resolution camera.
LG G7 Fit features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 30% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.