Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit, having a 77.9 score against 77. These phones use Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has the older 4.4.4 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even being the best device in this comparison, we must tell that it is also a older, notably thicker and heavier device.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo and LG G7 Fit both feature similar displays, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per screen inch.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way higher resolution back camera. LG G7 Fit has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has superior battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 30 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.