Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 81.2 score against 77. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has an older 14 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50's body has the same thickness than the LG G7 Fit, but it is heavier.
LG G7 Fit features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser cores and 4 GB less RAM memory. LG G7 Fit features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has way less brightness and a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light environments and a way bigger sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.