Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic indigo |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting a general score of 79.7 against 77. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Motorola Moto G Stylus design is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
Moto G Stylus counts with a little faster CPU than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger number of cores (but slower). The LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a better display density.
Moto G Stylus features a better memory capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a way bigger sensor and a lot larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
The Moto G Stylus features better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.