Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 563 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while LG G7 Fit works with Android 8.1 Oreo operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a incredibly newer cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, although it's somewhat thicker and much heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has more cpu cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a little bit more storage to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A32 has a way better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.