Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, with an 82.3 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a just a little heavier cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but both are 0.31inches thick. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A60 has 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy A60 has a little bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (although they are slower). The LG G7 Fit has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A60 counts with just a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a 16 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A60 also has a way larger aperture for better low-light captures and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 features a little better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.