Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Although the Galaxy A71 5G is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores. LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater pixels number in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A71 5G features a greater camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Galaxy A71 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A71 5G features a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.