Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a global score of 84.9 against 77. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy A80 is a incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than LG G7 Fit. The LG G7 Fit features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG G7 Fit features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A80 features just a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A80 features a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.