Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's a little thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, while LG G7 Fit comes with Android 8.1 Oreo OS.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit features a much better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos, a back camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.