Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 81 score against 77. Galaxy C9 Pro's body is thinner than the LG G7 Fit, but it's heavier and was released about a year before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C9 Pro has an older 6.0 Marshmallow version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores (although they are slower). The LG G7 Fit features a much better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a bit bigger display and a lot better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy C9 Pro has improved battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG G7 Fit shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.