Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 83.3 score against 77. Although the Samsung Galaxy M30s is newer than LG G7 Fit, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M30s has an older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
LG G7 Fit features a better display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G7 Fit has a little bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has more processing cores. The Galaxy M30s counts with a really longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 100 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy M30s takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M30s also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a lot larger camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.