Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a noticeably newer and noticeably thinner phone than the LG G7 Fit, although it is much heavier. These phones come with Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The LG G7 Fit features a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a way lower display pixels density, it also counts with a way larger display, a lot brighter display and a little bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 90% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.