Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, with a general score of 81 against 80.3. Although the LG G7 ThinQ is a bit thicker than the Google Nexus 6P, it's a little bit lighter and incredibly newer. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a quite greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a bit bigger display.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 15% larger battery capacity. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a way tinier sensor capturing much worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with faster video frame rates, a camera in the back with a lot higher 16 MP resolution and a bigger aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.