Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. The Google Pixel 2 design has the same thickness than LG G7 ThinQ, but it's somewhat lighter. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a larger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display.
The LG G7 ThinQ has much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 2. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The LG G7 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality images and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a way more megapixels camera, higher video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.