Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ's overall score of 81. The Google Pixel XL body is older, a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the LG G7 ThinQ. LG G7 ThinQ has a much better display than Google Pixel XL, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little bit greater screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG G7 ThinQ has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher number of cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture, a camera in the back with a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution and higher video frame rate.
The Google Pixel XL has just a little better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG G7 ThinQ, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.