Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than the LG V20, getting an 81 score against 77. LG G7 ThinQ is a newer and just a little bit lighter phone than the LG V20, but it's also just a little thicker. LG G7 ThinQ has a little better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG G7 ThinQ also has more CPU cores.
LG G7 ThinQ features a more vivid display than LG V20, because it has a quite better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a quite bigger display and a just a bit higher display pixels density. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with faster video frame rates and a bigger aperture.
The LG V20 features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as LG G7 ThinQ, both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V20 counts with a bit better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG G7 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG V20, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.