Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. Although LG G7 ThinQ is older than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, it's body is lighter and thinner. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11, so it counts with lots of additional features.
LG G7 ThinQ features a way better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher display pixel density. LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus shoots better videos and photos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features greater battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.