Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Moto Z4, getting a global score of 81 against 79.8. Despite of the fact LG G7 ThinQ is older and a little thicker than Moto Z4, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z4. Both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG G7 ThinQ has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z4 captures better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z4 also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a way larger sensor.
Motorola Moto Z4 features superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.