Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 overall score. The LG G7 ThinQ design is just a bit thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. LG G7 ThinQ features a more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.