Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 563 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ's global score of 81. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than LG G7 ThinQ. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while LG G7 ThinQ works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A32. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a slightly better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.