Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 82.3 score against 81. Samsung Galaxy A60 is a a bit heavier phone than the LG G7 ThinQ, but both are 0.31inches thick. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has an older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater screen density. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 megapixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video and higher video frame rate.
The Galaxy A60 has just a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.