Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than the LG G7 ThinQ, with a score of 90.5 against 81. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's body is newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, although it's noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures better videos and photos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG G7 ThinQ has slightly more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.