Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is slightly better than the LG G7 ThinQ, with a overall score of 83.3 against 81. Galaxy M30s is a newer phone than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30s. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a superior camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy M30s has a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 100 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.