Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. LG G7 ThinQ's body is much lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's a lot thicker and was released many years before. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower pixel amount per inch in the display, it also counts with much more brightness, a slightly better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a really larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 90% more battery size. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot higher video quality.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.