Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50, getting an 84.3 score against 81.2. LG G8 ThinQ is a much older and just a bit thicker device than Motorola Edge 50, but LG could make it just a little lighter anyway. These phones work with Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 has a screen that's very similar to the display in LG G8 ThinQ, because although the Motorola Edge 50 has a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, it also counts with way more brightness and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots better pictures and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a really longer battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.