Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, getting a score of 84.3 against 79.7. The LG G8 ThinQ body is a little thinner and lighter than Moto G Stylus, even though it was released only 12 months before. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ has a brighter display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
LG G8 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Moto G Stylus features a bit longer battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG G8 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.