Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a score of 84.3 against 79.9. LG G8 ThinQ's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is lighter. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a little better processing power than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.