Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 563 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than LG G8 ThinQ, having a overall score of 84.7 against 84.3. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Galaxy A32 design is newer than the LG G8 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. LG G8 ThinQ features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and much more pixels per inch of screen.
LG G8 ThinQ features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 has a bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more megapixels back camera. Galaxy A32 features a much better battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.