Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-11 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the LG G8 ThinQ's score of 84.3. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A80 is a thicker and much heavier phone than LG G8 ThinQ. The LG G8 ThinQ has a better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A80, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has just a little bit longer battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.