Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 84.3 against 77.8. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and increased performance. LG G8 ThinQ's body is incredibly lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's much thicker and was released many years before.
LG G8 ThinQ has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has much less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a much bigger display, a quite better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a really brighter screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit more storage to store more apps and games than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The LG G8 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.