Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 82.5 score against 77.8. The LG G8S ThinQ design is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released many years before. These phones use Android operating system, but LG G8S ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a little greater amount of pixels in each screen inch, a bigger screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photography, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.