Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, having an 82.7 score against 80.3. LG G8X ThinQ's body is noticeably newer than the Google Nexus 6P's, although it's thicker and just a bit heavier. The LG G8X ThinQ features a little faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density. LG G8X ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back camera, a tinier sensor shooting worse quality photographs and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. The LG G8X ThinQ features a little better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.