Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Google Pixel XL, having an 82.7 score against 81.3. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but heavier than Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel XL counts with a little bit better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.