Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than the LG V20's 77 score. Although the LG G8X ThinQ is much newer than the LG V20, it is a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG V20 features a little bit better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel number per inch of display. LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a back camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a larger sensor.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG G8X ThinQ counts with better battery life than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG V20, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.