Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with a score of 82.7 against 77.9. LG G8X ThinQ's design is a lot newer and notably thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The LG G8X ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.