Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. The LG G8X ThinQ is better than Motorola Edge 50, we must note that it is also incredibly older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712, a little better amount of pixels in each display inch and a little larger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 features a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.