Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, with an 82.7 score against 79.7. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11. LG G8X ThinQ's body has the same weight than Moto G Stylus, but it is just a little thinner.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G Stylus captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better low-light images.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto G Stylus's battery life is just as good as the battery duration in LG G8X ThinQ.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.