Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than Moto Z4, with an 82.7 score against 79.8. Both phones we are comparing here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should provide you identical OS features. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is thicker and heavier than the Moto Z4. LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z4. Both of them have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the same pixel density and a screen with the same size.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z4 captures better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.