Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's score of 82.7. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while LG G8X ThinQ counts with Android 10 OS. Galaxy A32 is a newer cellphone than LG G8X ThinQ, but it is just a little heavier and a little thicker.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A32 has longer battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.