Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 general score. Galaxy A7 (2018) is an older cellphone than the LG G8X ThinQ, but Samsung made it somewhat lighter and just a little thinner anyway. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018). They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite larger screen. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in low light situations and a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better video quality.
The LG G8X ThinQ has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.