Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, with a score of 84.9 against 82.7. Galaxy A80 is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than LG G8X ThinQ. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
LG G8X ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A80, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A80 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG G8X ThinQ has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.