Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 82.7 score against 81. The LG G8X ThinQ design is incredibly newer than Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's a bit heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a little greater pixel density.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images in low light situations and a way better video resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro's battery life is just as good as the battery life in LG G8X ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.