Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than the Xperia XZ3, with an 82.7 score against 79.6. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG G8X ThinQ is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xperia XZ3.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ3 features a better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG G8X ThinQ features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ has superior battery life than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xperia XZ3 takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a bigger sensor and a much higher resolution back camera.
The LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.