Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a global score of 82.7 against 77.8. The LG G8X ThinQ is a notably older and thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG was able to make it lighter anyway. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
LG G8X ThinQ features a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a larger display, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a little greater pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light images, a back facing camera with much more MP and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.