Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-20 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.36 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is better than LG K40, getting a overall score of 77 against 69.8. Despite of the fact the LG V20 is a lot older and heavier than LG K40, it's design is still just a little thinner. LG V20 counts with a brighter display than LG K40, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V20 also has a much higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
LG K40 counts with just a bit better performance than LG V20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. LG V20 features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than LG K40, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V20 also has 64 GB internal memory.
The LG V20 captures much clearer photos and videos than LG K40, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a back camera with way more megapixels, a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos. LG V20 counts with a little longer battery performance than LG K40, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V20 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the LG K40.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.