Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is much better than LG K50's score of 72.2. Google Pixel 2's body is a little thinner and lighter than LG K50, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before. Google Pixel 2 has a better display than LG K50, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot better number of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
LG K50 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better camera than LG K50, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition, a larger diafragm aperture and a larger camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality. LG K50 has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.