Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the LG K50, having a general score of 83.7 against 72.2. Even though LG V50 ThinQ and the LG K50 were released only a couple months apart, LG V50 ThinQ's construction is just a little thinner but just a little bit heavier than the LG K50. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than LG K50, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little larger screen and a lot higher display pixels density.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a better camera than LG K50, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior storage for games and applications than LG K50, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 96 GB more internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior battery performance than LG K50, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.