Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is way better than LG K50's 72.2 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is just a little heavier than LG K50, it's a little bit thinner and newer. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a more vivid display than LG K50, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A71 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG K50, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better processing unit than LG K50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features greater battery life than LG K50, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than LG K50, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.