Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a global score of 86.5, which is better than LG K50's overall score of 72.2. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Samsung Galaxy M31 is a better cellphone than the LG K50, we must highlight that it is also a a little heavier and a bit thicker cellphone.
Galaxy M31 features a much better looking screen than LG K50, because it has a much higher pixel quantity per inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The LG K50 has just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a little bit better performance than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy M31 takes much better pictures and videos than LG K50, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy M31 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG K50, because it has a 71 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.