Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the LG K50, with a general score of 77.8 against 72.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much newer and noticeably thinner phone than LG K50, but it's also notably heavier.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than LG K50, because it has a larger screen, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a lot higher count of pixels per inch of screen. LG K50 features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than LG K50, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than LG K50, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than LG K50, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.